Method development in analytical toxicology

Our department (Department of Forensic Sciences) has a national responsibility to carry out forensic toxicological analyses for the detection of drugs of abuse and medicinal drugs. In forensic toxicology, a continuously expanding range of compounds has to be identified and quantified. Since the results of forensic toxicological analysis are used by the judicial system, an unambiguous identification, and accurate and precise quantification, are of paramount importance. Our Forensic Analytical Toxicology research group aims to develop analytical methods with high quality and relevant repertoires in common forensic biological matrices. For determination of medicinal and drugs of abuse we mainly use techniques such as UHPLC-MS/MS and UHPLC-QTOF-MS as well as HS-GC-FID for ethanol analysis. We focus on automation and use robots for sample preparation on 96-well plates. Members of the research group also participates in research projects in the other forensic sciences research groups at Oslo University Hospital (Ethanol and ethanol metabolites, Analysis of alternative matrices). The developed methods are used for both routine analysis of forensic toxicology samples and research projects.

Photo: Thomas Berg and Dag Helge Strand, Oslo University Hospital.

Ongoing projects

Development of a UHPLC-MS/MS method for determination of PEth in whole blood

Phosphatidylethanol (PEth) is a collective term for abnormal phospholipids formed from fatty acids in the membranes of various cell types including red blood cells in the presence of ethanol. Almost 50 different homologs of PEth have been identified, with PEth 16:0/18:1 as one of the most abundant. Because PEth forms exclusively in the presence of ethanol and the concentration measured can be related to ethanol consumption, it has been increasingly used as a marker to evaluate alcohol intake. Our research group has established a method for determination of PEth 16:0/18:1 and 16:0/18:2 in forensic whole blood samples by UHPLC-MS/MS.

Comparative evaluation of carboxyhemoglobin quantification in postmortem blood by oximetry and headspace gas chromatography with flame ionization detection

The HS-GC-FID methods have been regarded as the reference method in forensic toxicology, however, the methods are often complex, time consuming, demand dedicated instrumentation and specialized trained analysts. The CO-oximeters have been developed for diagnostic blood gas analyses in hospitals and local health service for the 0-20% carboxyhemoglobin (COHb) saturation range. However, in forensic toxicology, the relevant COHb range is from 0-100% saturation. This study compares the carbon monoxide (CO) fractions found in postmortem whole blood samples by using two different methods, CO-oximetry and headspace gas chromatography with flame ionization detection combined with determination of iron (Fe) by atom absorption spectrophotometry (HS-GC-FID-AAS). The study found that COHb determination in forensic postmortem whole blood could be based on oximetry analysis alone, with acceptable accuracy, precision, and robustness over the whole range of COHb saturation.

UHPLC-QTOF-MS methods for determination of illegal and medicinal drugs

We have been working on developing and improving screening methods using UHPLC-QTOF-MS for many years. The main focus has been on methods for medicinal drugs and new psychoactive substances (NPS) in autopsy samples (whole blood and sometimes muscles), but also methods for detecting NPS in blood samples from police cases as well as in oral fluid from prison service cases.

Development of a method for analysis of cannabidiol and metabolites for use at the National Centre for Epilepsy

Due to increased interest in the use of cannabidiol in treatment of severe epilepsy, collaboration with the National Centre for Epilepsy has been initiated on their request to aid in development of a method for analysis of cannabidiol and metabolites.

Past projects

Development of methods for determination of medicinal and illicit drugs in urine, whole blood and oral fluid by UHPLC-MS/MS

We have been working on developing and improving screening and confirmation methods using UHPLC-MS/MS for many years. The main focus has been on methods for medicinal and illicit drugs in forensic whole blood samples (antemortem and postmortem), urine and oral fluid (Analysis of alternative matrices). The necessity for 13C- and 2H-labeled internal standards for the quantitative determination of compounds in biological samples by UHPLC-MS/MS has been shown in several publications.

Development of methods for determination of ethanol and ethanol metabolites

Ethanol is one of the most frequently found compounds in forensic samples. We have worked on development of methods for screening and quantification of ethanol and other alcohols. The possibility of postmortem production of ethanol makes correct interpretation of ethanol detection in forensic autopsy samples difficult. The nonoxidative metabolites of ethanol, ethyl glucuronide (EtG) and ethyl sulfate (EtS) are direct ethanol metabolites and can be used to distinguish antemortem ethanol intake from postmortem formation of ethanol and in addition can be a helpful tool in assessment of the hip-flask defense. The research group has contributed to other research projects and has developed methods for determination of EtG and EtS in forensic samples (Ethanol and ethanol metabolites and Analysis of alternative matrices).

Determination of safety margins for whole blood concentrations of alcohol and nineteen drugs in driving under the influence cases

Measurement uncertainties constitutes of variations on each level in the analytical method; calibration curve, sample withdrawal, sample preparation and chromatographic analysis. In forensic toxicology where there are legislative concentration limits, safety margins have been established in order to ensure that the true concentration is as least as high as the reported concentration, with a 99% safety level. In collaboration with the Norwegian Computing Center, we developed a model for determination of safety margins for alcohol and nineteen psychoactive drugs.

Collaboration

  • Cecile Johannesssen Landmark (professor), National Centre for Epilepsy, Complex Epilepsy Research Group and Therapeutic Drug Monitoring Research Group, Oslo University Hospital
  • André Gottås (Head engineer; PhD), National Centre for Epilepsy, Therapeutic Drug Monitoring Research Group, Oslo University Hospital

If you have questions about the projects or suggestions for research collaboration, please contact: Lena Kristoffersen (rmlekr@ous-hf.no) at the Department of Forensic Sciences, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.

 

Publications

Sidqey D, Liane VH, Kristoffersen L (2021)
Quantitative Determination of Ethyl Glucuronide and Ethyl Sulfate in Postmortem and Antemortem Whole Blood Using Phospholipid Removal 96-Well Plate and UHPLC-MS-MS
J Anal Toxicol, 45 (4), 378-388
DOI 10.1093/jat/bkaa108, PubMed 32816025

Schüller M, Tran KTT, Øiestad EL, Pedersen-Bjergaard S (2021)
Membrane-based liquid-phase microextraction of basic pharmaceuticals - A study on the optimal extraction window
J Chromatogr A, 1664, 462769 (in press)
DOI 10.1016/j.chroma.2021.462769, PubMed 34998024

Skaalvik TG, Øiestad EL, Trones R, Pedersen-Bjergaard S, Hegstad S (2021)
Determination of psychoactive drugs in serum using conductive vial electromembrane extraction combined with UHPLC-MS/MS
J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci, 1183, 122926
DOI 10.1016/j.jchromb.2021.122926, PubMed 34624684

Jørgenrud B, Skadberg E, de Carvalho Ponce J, Furuhaugen H, Berg T (2020)
Determination of the alcohol biomarker phosphatidylethanol 16:0/18:1 and 33 compounds from eight different drug classes in whole blood by LC-MS/MS
J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods, 107, 106939
DOI 10.1016/j.vascn.2020.106939, PubMed 33257303

Ask KS, Lid M, Øiestad EL, Pedersen-Bjergaard S, Gjelstad A (2019)
Liquid-phase microextraction in 96-well plates - calibration and accurate quantification of pharmaceuticals in human plasma samples
J Chromatogr A, 1602, 117-123
DOI 10.1016/j.chroma.2019.06.013, PubMed 31229251

Berg T, Eliassen E, Jørgenrud B, Kabashi S, Petukhov A, Bogstrand ST (2018)
Determination of phosphatidylethanol 16:0/18:1 in whole blood by 96-well supported liquid extraction and UHPLC-MS/MS
J Clin Lab Anal, 33 (1), e22631
DOI 10.1002/jcla.22631, PubMed 30047172

Bergh MS, Bogen IL, Wilson SR, Øiestad ÅML (2018)
Addressing the Fentanyl Analogue Epidemic by Multiplex UHPLC-MS/MS Analysis of Whole Blood
Ther Drug Monit, 40 (6), 738-748
DOI 10.1097/FTD.0000000000000564, PubMed 30157097

Kristoffersen L, Langødegård M, Gaare KI, Amundsen I, Terland MN, Strand DH (2018)
Determination of 12 commonly found compounds in DUID cases in whole blood using fully automated supported liquid extraction and UHPLC-MS/MS
J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci, 1093-1094, 8-23
DOI 10.1016/j.jchromb.2018.06.050, PubMed 29980102

Oiestad AML, Berg T, Eliassen E, Wiklund T, Sand K, Oiestad EL (2018)
Separation of isomers of new psychoactive substances and isotope-labeled amphetamines using UHPSFC-MS/MS and UHPLC-MS/MS
J. Liq. Chromatogr. Relat. Technol., 41 (7), 391-400
DOI 10.1080/10826076.2017.1388818

Takitane J, Leyton V, Andreuccetti G, Gjerde H, Vindenes V, Berg T (2018)
Determination of cocaine, metabolites and a crack cocaine biomarker in whole blood by liquid-liquid extraction and UHPLC-MS/MS
Forensic Sci Int, 289, 165-174
DOI 10.1016/j.forsciint.2018.05.030, PubMed 29885489

Vårdal L, Wong G, Øiestad ÅML, Pedersen-Bjergaard S, Gjelstad A, Øiestad EL (2018)
Rapid determination of designer benzodiazepines, benzodiazepines, and Z-hypnotics in whole blood using parallel artificial liquid membrane extraction and UHPLC-MS/MS
Anal Bioanal Chem, 410 (20), 4967-4978
DOI 10.1007/s00216-018-1147-y, PubMed 29947895

Hegstad S, Kristoffersen L, Liane VH, Spigset O (2017)
EtG and EtS in Autopsy Blood Samples With and Without Putrefaction Using UPLC-MS-MS
J Anal Toxicol, 41 (2), 107-113
DOI 10.1093/jat/bkw123, PubMed 27798076

Valen A, Leere Øiestad ÅM, Strand DH, Skari R, Berg T (2016)
Determination of 21 drugs in oral fluid using fully automated supported liquid extraction and UHPLC-MS/MS
Drug Test Anal, 9 (5), 808-823
DOI 10.1002/dta.2045, PubMed 27464485

Kristoffersen L, Strand DH, Liane VH, Vindenes V, Tvete IF, Aldrin M (2015)
Determination of safety margins for whole blood concentrations of alcohol and nineteen drugs in driving under the influence cases
Forensic Sci Int, 259, 119-26
DOI 10.1016/j.forsciint.2015.12.009, PubMed 26773222

Berg T, Karlsen M, Oiestad AM, Johansen JE, Liu H, Strand DH (2014)
Evaluation of ¹³C- and ²H-labeled internal standards for the determination of amphetamines in biological samples, by reversed-phase ultra-high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry
J Chromatogr A, 1344, 83-90
DOI 10.1016/j.chroma.2014.04.020, PubMed 24780257

Eliassen E., Kristoffersen L. (2014)
Quantitative determination of zopiclone and zolpidem in whole blood by liquid-liquid extraction and UHPLC-MS/MS
J. Chromatog B: Anal. Technol. Biomed. Life Sci. 971 (72-80) 2014. 

Amundsen I, Oiestad ÅM, Ekeberg D, Kristoffersen L (2013)
Quantitative determination of fifteen basic pharmaceuticals in ante- and post-mortem whole blood by high pH mobile phase reversed phase ultra high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry
J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci, 927, 112-23
DOI 10.1016/j.jchromb.2012.12.039, PubMed 23380540

Berg T, Jørgenrud B, Strand DH (2013)
Determination of buprenorphine, fentanyl and LSD in whole blood by UPLC-MS-MS
J Anal Toxicol, 37 (3), 159-65
DOI 10.1093/jat/bkt005, PubMed 23423312

Berg T, Strand DH (2011)
¹³C labelled internal standards--a solution to minimize ion suppression effects in liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry analyses of drugs in biological samples?
J Chromatogr A, 1218 (52), 9366-74
DOI 10.1016/j.chroma.2011.10.081, PubMed 22119139

Dahl SR, Olsen KM, Strand DH (2011)
Determination of γ-hydroxybutyrate (GHB), β-hydroxybutyrate (BHB), pregabalin, 1,4-butane-diol (1,4BD) and γ-butyrolactone (GBL) in whole blood and urine samples by UPLC-MSMS
J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci, 885-886, 37-42
DOI 10.1016/j.jchromb.2011.12.009, PubMed 22226469

Karinen R, Øiestad EL, Andresen W, Smith-Kielland A, Christophersen A (2011)
Comparison of the stability of stock solutions of drugs of abuse and other drugs stored in a freezer, refrigerator, and at ambient temperature for up to one year
J Anal Toxicol, 35 (8), 583-90
DOI 10.1093/anatox/35.8.583, PubMed 22004679

Oiestad EL, Johansen U, Oiestad AM, Christophersen AS (2011)
Drug screening of whole blood by ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry
J Anal Toxicol, 35 (5), 280-93
DOI 10.1093/anatox/35.5.280, PubMed 21619723

Sauve EN, Langødegård M, Ekeberg D, Øiestad AM (2011)
Determination of benzodiazepines in ante-mortem and post-mortem whole blood by solid-supported liquid-liquid extraction and UPLC-MS/MS
J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci, 883-884, 177-88
DOI 10.1016/j.jchromb.2011.10.033, PubMed 22119506

Karinen R, Oiestad EL, Andresen W, Wethe G, Smith-Kielland A, Christophersen A (2010)
Comparison of ethanol and other drugs of abuse concentrations in whole blood stored in venoject glass and plastic and venosafe plastic evacuated tubes
J Anal Toxicol, 34 (7), 420-8
DOI 10.1093/jat/34.7.420, PubMed 20822681

Berg T, Lundanes E, Christophersen AS, Strand DH (2008)
Determination of opiates and cocaine in urine by high pH mobile phase reversed phase UPLC-MS/MS
J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci, 877 (4), 421-32
DOI 10.1016/j.jchromb.2008.12.052, PubMed 19144579

Kristoffersen L, Stormyhr LE, Smith-Kielland A (2006)
Headspace gas chromatographic determination of ethanol: the use of factorial design to study effects of blood storage and headspace conditions on ethanol stability and acetaldehyde formation in whole blood and plasma
Forensic Sci Int, 161 (2-3), 151-7
DOI 10.1016/j.forsciint.2006.03.034, PubMed 16843627

Kristoffersen L, Smith-Kielland A (2005)
An automated alcohol dehydrogenase method for ethanol quantification in urine and whole blood
J Anal Toxicol, 29 (5), 387-9
DOI 10.1093/jat/29.5.387, PubMed 16105266

 
Page visits: 164