Publications by Michael Bretthauer
351 publications found
Publications 2025
- 
 Safety of artificial intelligence-assisted optical diagnosis for leaving colorectal polyps in situ during colonoscopy (PRACTICE): a non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial
 Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol, 10 (10), 915-923
 DOI 10.1016/S2468-1253(25)00140-2, PubMed 40914178
- 
 [What is confirmed in colorectal cancer screening?]
 Inn Med (Heidelb) (in press)
 DOI 10.1007/s00108-025-01983-5, PubMed 40952509
- 
 Use of computer-assisted detection (CADe) colonoscopy in colorectal cancer screening and surveillance: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Position Statement
 Endoscopy, 57 (6), 667-673
 DOI 10.1055/a-2543-0370, PubMed 40148135
- 
 Trinnvis kileklyngerandomisering
 Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen, 145 (8)
 DOI 10.4045/tidsskr.25.0094, PubMed 40575822
- 
 First head-to-head trial of colonoscopy versus faecal testing for colorectal cancer screening
 Lancet, 405 (10486), 1204-1206
 DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(25)00288-0, PubMed 40158522
- 
 Endoscopist deskilling risk after exposure to artificial intelligence in colonoscopy: a multicentre, observational study
 Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol, 10 (10), 896-903
 DOI 10.1016/S2468-1253(25)00133-5, PubMed 40816301
- 
 Large language models for detecting colorectal polyps in endoscopic images
 Gut (in press)
 DOI 10.1136/gutjnl-2025-335091, PubMed 40360230
- 
 Gastroenterology/Hepatology: What You May Have Missed in 2024
 Ann Intern Med, 178 (5_Supplement), S39-S53
 DOI 10.7326/ANNALS-25-00959, PubMed 40163879
- 
 Adenoma detection and subsequent colorectal cancer risk: is the race really over?
 Gut (in press)
 DOI 10.1136/gutjnl-2025-335225, PubMed 40579120
- 
 Leaving colorectal polyps in situ with endocytoscopy assisted by computer-aided diagnosis: a cost-effectiveness study
 Endoscopy, 57 (6), 611-619
 DOI 10.1055/a-2532-9282, PubMed 39999970
- 
 Correction: Leaving colorectal polyps in situ with endocytoscopy assisted by computer-aided diagnosis: a cost-effectiveness study
 Endoscopy, 57 (6), C6
 DOI 10.1055/a-2548-0262, PubMed 40020708
- 
 Benefits, burden, and harms of computer aided polyp detection with artificial intelligence in colorectal cancer screening: microsimulation modelling study
 BMJ Med, 4 (1), e001446
 DOI 10.1136/bmjmed-2025-001446, PubMed 40166696
- 
 Å forberede medisinstudenter på usikkerhet
 Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen, 145 (10)
 DOI 10.4045/tidsskr.25.0480, PubMed 40923171
- 
 Fecal Microbiota Transplantation Versus Vancomycin for Primary Clostridioides difficile Infection : A Randomized Controlled Trial
 Ann Intern Med, 178 (7), 940-947
 DOI 10.7326/ANNALS-24-03285, PubMed 40523286
- 
 Screening for Helicobacter pylori to Prevent Gastric Cancer
 JAMA, 333 (9), 812-813
 DOI 10.1001/jama.2024.26377, PubMed 39908039
- 
 Large language model for interpreting the Paris classification of colorectal polyps
 Endosc Int Open, 13, a27030209
 DOI 10.1055/a-2703-0209, PubMed 41079216
- 
 Environmental Impact of Computer-Aided Diagnosis in Colonoscopy: A Carbon Footprint Assessment of a Prospective Study Cohort
 Endoscopy (in press)
 DOI 10.1055/a-2717-8365, PubMed 41056995
- 
 Adenoma Detection Rates by Physicians and Subsequent Colorectal Cancer Risk
 JAMA, 333 (5), 400-407
 DOI 10.1001/jama.2024.22975, PubMed 39680377
- 
 Effect of colonoscopy screening on risks of colorectal cancer and related death: instrumental variable estimation of per-protocol effects
 Eur J Epidemiol, 40 (4), 419-425
 DOI 10.1007/s10654-025-01209-w, PubMed 40278966
- 
 Artificial intelligence and colorectal neoplasia detection performances in patients with positive fecal immunochemical test: Meta-analysis and systematic review
 Dig Endosc, 37 (8), 815-823
 DOI 10.1111/den.15034, PubMed 40328639
- 
 Screening for many types of cancer with a single blood sample - too good to be true?
 Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen, 145 (5)
 DOI 10.4045/tidsskr.25.0077, PubMed 40272130
- 
 Temporal trends in characteristics and management of inflammatory bowel disease
 Scand J Gastroenterol, 60 (5), 421-429
 DOI 10.1080/00365521.2025.2478166, PubMed 40126153
Publications 2024
- 
 QUAIDE - Quality assessment of AI preclinical studies in diagnostic endoscopy
 Gut, 74 (1), 153-161
 DOI 10.1136/gutjnl-2024-332820, PubMed 39406471
- 
 Gastroenterology/Hepatology: What You May Have Missed in 2023
 Ann Intern Med, 177 (5_Supplement), S27-S36
 DOI 10.7326/M24-0505, PubMed 38621241
- 
 Risk factors for metachronous colorectal cancer or advanced lesions after endoscopic resection of serrated polyps: a systematic review and meta-analysis
 Gastrointest Endosc, 100 (4), 605-615.e14
 DOI 10.1016/j.gie.2024.05.021, PubMed 38851458
- 
 How to learn from interval cancers in colorectal cancer screening
 Endoscopy, 56 (5), 373-375
 DOI 10.1055/a-2279-9932, PubMed 38479414
- 
 Pasientjournaler og nasjonale kvalitetsregistre – to sider av samme sak
 Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen, 144 (14)
 DOI 10.4045/tidsskr.24.0525, PubMed 39605158
- 
 Lifetime Gained With Cancer Screening-Reply
 JAMA Intern Med, 184 (2), 228
 DOI 10.1001/jamainternmed.2023.7067, PubMed 38165695
- 
 Brief sigmoidoscopy provides 21-year colorectal cancer risk reduction in men
 Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol, 9 (9), 777-779
 DOI 10.1016/S2468-1253(24)00199-7, PubMed 39038481
- 
 ESGE and Public Advocacy
 Endoscopy, 56 (6), 457-458
 DOI 10.1055/a-2277-2204, PubMed 38810622
- 
 Advancing patient-centered care: Recent developments in UEG's patient relations
 United European Gastroenterol J, 12 (6), 816-818
 DOI 10.1002/ueg2.12607, PubMed 38867386
- 
 [Scraps of national clinical guidelines from the Directorate of Health]
 Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen, 144 (5)
 DOI 10.4045/tidsskr.24.0141, PubMed 38651715
- 
 Effectiveness of Colonoscopy Screening vs Sigmoidoscopy Screening in Colorectal Cancer
 JAMA Netw Open, 7 (2), e240007
 DOI 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.0007, PubMed 38421651
- 
 Prediction of metachronous advanced colorectal neoplasia by KRAS mutation in polyps
 United European Gastroenterol J, 12 (9), 1179-1189
 DOI 10.1002/ueg2.12667, PubMed 39400528
- 
 Surgical treatment of benign colorectal polyps 2008-21
 Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen, 144 (10)
 DOI 10.4045/tidsskr.23.0722, PubMed 39254026
- 
 Carbon-Footprint Analyses in RCTs - Toward Sustainable Clinical Practice
 N Engl J Med, 390 (24), 2234-2236
 DOI 10.1056/NEJMp2402018, PubMed 38749030
- 
 Performance of Faecal Immunochemical Testing for Colorectal Cancer Screening at Varying Positivity Thresholds
 Aliment Pharmacol Ther, 61 (1), 122-131
 DOI 10.1111/apt.18314, PubMed 39373173
- 
 Impact of inadequate bowel cleansing in sigmoidoscopy screening
 Scand J Gastroenterol, 59 (8), 1002-1009
 DOI 10.1080/00365521.2024.2364213, PubMed 38850200
- 
 Adverse events after colonoscopy in a randomised colorectal cancer screening trial
 BMJ Open Gastroenterol, 11 (1)
 DOI 10.1136/bmjgast-2024-001471, PubMed 39375173
- 
 Authors' Reply: Interpreting epidemiologic studies of colonoscopy screening for colorectal cancer prevention
 Eur J Epidemiol, 39 (4), 431
 DOI 10.1007/s10654-023-01077-2, PubMed 38261147
- 
 Dramatic improvements in outcome following pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic and periampullary cancers
 Br J Cancer, 131 (4), 747-754
 DOI 10.1038/s41416-024-02757-w, PubMed 38937622
Publications 2023
- 
 The Future of Cancer Screening-Guided Without Conflicts of Interest
 JAMA Intern Med, 183 (10), 1047-1048
 DOI 10.1001/jamainternmed.2023.4064, PubMed 37639267
- 
 The New European Medical Device Regulation: Balancing Innovation and Patient Safety
 Ann Intern Med, 176 (6), 844-848
 DOI 10.7326/M23-0454, PubMed 37068279
- 
 What is my risk, doctor? How to convey disease risk and treatment effects
 BMJ, 381, e075289
 DOI 10.1136/bmj-2022-075289, PubMed 37328165
- 
 Colonoscopy Screening and Colorectal Cancer Incidence and Mortality. Reply
 N Engl J Med, 388 (4), 378-379
 DOI 10.1056/NEJMc2215192, PubMed 36720146
- 
 Gastrointestinal endoscopy devices and the European Union Medical Device Regulation: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Position Statement
 Endoscopy, 55 (6), 578-581
 DOI 10.1055/a-2052-2540, PubMed 37080238
- 
 Estimated Lifetime Gained With Cancer Screening Tests: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials
 JAMA Intern Med, 183 (11), 1196-1203
 DOI 10.1001/jamainternmed.2023.3798, PubMed 37639247
- 
 New American College of Physicians Guidance on Colorectal Cancer Screening: Less Is More
 Ann Intern Med, 176 (8), 1127-1128
 DOI 10.7326/M23-1695, PubMed 37523706
- 
 Informed consent for endoscopic procedures: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Position Statement
 Endoscopy, 55 (10), 952-966
 DOI 10.1055/a-2133-3365, PubMed 37557899
- 
 [Colorectal cancer screening also for younger adults?]
 Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen, 143 (18)
 DOI 10.4045/tidsskr.23.0553, PubMed 38088289
- 
 A Comparison of Risk Classification Systems of Colorectal Adenomas: A Case-Cohort Study
 Gastroenterology, 165 (2), 483-491.e7
 DOI 10.1053/j.gastro.2023.04.028, PubMed 37146913
- 
 [Do the Directorate of Health’s guidelines adhere to international standards for trustworthy clinical practice?]
 Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen, 143 (14)
 DOI 10.4045/tidsskr.23.0110, PubMed 37830968
- 
 Interpreting epidemiologic studies of colonoscopy screening for colorectal cancer prevention: understanding the mechanisms of action is key
 Eur J Epidemiol, 38 (9), 929-931
 DOI 10.1007/s10654-023-01043-y, PubMed 37667139
- 
 Authors' Reply: Interpreting epidemiologic studies of colorectal cancer prevention
 Eur J Epidemiol, 39 (1), 99
 DOI 10.1007/s10654-023-01070-9, PubMed 37950085
- 
 Combination of Mucosa-Exposure Device and Computer-Aided Detection for Adenoma Detection During Colonoscopy: A Randomized Trial
 Gastroenterology, 165 (1), 244-251.e3
 DOI 10.1053/j.gastro.2023.03.237, PubMed 37061169
- 
 A pilot study of implementation of endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty (ESG) in Norway
 Scand J Gastroenterol, 58 (10), 1180-1184
 DOI 10.1080/00365521.2023.2204389, PubMed 37128713
- 
 Risk of malignant lymphomas in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: a population-based cohort study
 BMJ Open Gastroenterol, 10 (1)
 DOI 10.1136/bmjgast-2022-001037, PubMed 37142293
- 
 A novel framework for incorporating patient values and preferences in making guideline recommendations: guideline panel surveys
 J Clin Epidemiol, 161, 164-172
 DOI 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2023.07.003, PubMed 37453455
- 
 Qualitative study of guideline panelists: innovative surveys provided valuable insights regarding patient values and preferences
 J Clin Epidemiol, 161, 173-180
 DOI 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2023.07.014, PubMed 37517505
Publications 2022
- 
 Impact of artificial intelligence on colorectal polyp detection for early-career endoscopists: an international comparative study
 Scand J Gastroenterol, 57 (10), 1272-1277
 DOI 10.1080/00365521.2022.2070436, PubMed 35605150
- 
 Cost-effectiveness of artificial intelligence for screening colonoscopy: a modelling study
 Lancet Digit Health, 4 (6), e436-e444
 DOI 10.1016/S2589-7500(22)00042-5, PubMed 35430151
- 
 Risk Factors for Metachronous Colorectal Cancer or Advanced Adenomas After Endoscopic Resection of High-risk Adenomas
 Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol, 21 (3), 630-643
 DOI 10.1016/j.cgh.2022.12.005, PubMed 36549471
- 
 Speedometer for withdrawal time monitoring during colonoscopy: a clinical implementation trial
 Scand J Gastroenterol, 58 (6), 664-670
 DOI 10.1080/00365521.2022.2154616, PubMed 36519564
- 
 Real-Time Artificial Intelligence-Based Optical Diagnosis of Neoplastic Polyps during Colonoscopy
 NEJM Evid, 1 (6), EVIDoa2200003
 DOI 10.1056/EVIDoa2200003, PubMed 38319238
- 
 Effect of Colonoscopy Screening on Risks of Colorectal Cancer and Related Death
 N Engl J Med, 387 (17), 1547-1556
 DOI 10.1056/NEJMoa2208375, PubMed 36214590
- 
 UEG position paper: Obesity and digestive health
 United European Gastroenterol J, 10 (10), 1199-1201
 DOI 10.1002/ueg2.12334, PubMed 36457185
- 
 Digestive cancer screening across Europe
 United European Gastroenterol J, 10 (4), 435-437
 DOI 10.1002/ueg2.12230, PubMed 35474447
- 
 Variability in adenoma detection rate in control groups of randomized colonoscopy trials: a systematic review and meta-analysis
 Gastrointest Endosc, 97 (2), 212-225.e7
 DOI 10.1016/j.gie.2022.10.009, PubMed 36243103
- 
 Comparative Performance of Artificial Intelligence Optical Diagnosis Systems for Leaving in Situ Colorectal Polyps
 Gastroenterology, 164 (3), 467-469.e4
 DOI 10.1053/j.gastro.2022.10.021, PubMed 36328079
- 
 Reply to: Letter to the Editor regarding "Covid-19 transmission in fitness centers in Norway-a randomized trial"
 BMC Public Health, 22 (1), 2437
 DOI 10.1186/s12889-022-14799-x, PubMed 36575428
- 
 Novel "resect and analysis" approach for T2 colorectal cancer with use of artificial intelligence
 Gastrointest Endosc, 96 (4), 665-672.e1
 DOI 10.1016/j.gie.2022.04.1305, PubMed 35500659
- 
 Letter: long-term colorectal cancer incidence and mortality after adenoma removal associated with heritable factors, colonoscopic surveillance and aspirin-authors' reply
 Aliment Pharmacol Ther, 55 (10), 1363-1364
 DOI 10.1111/apt.16929, PubMed 35472187
- 
 Emergency hospital admissions, prognosis, and population mortality in Norway during the first wave of the Covid-19 epidemic
 Scand J Public Health, 50 (6), 795-802
 DOI 10.1177/14034948221082959, PubMed 35546560
- 
 15-Year Benefits of Sigmoidoscopy Screening on Colorectal Cancer Incidence and Mortality : A Pooled Analysis of Randomized Trials
 Ann Intern Med, 175 (11), 1525-1533
 DOI 10.7326/M22-0835, PubMed 36215714
- 
 Rates of repeated colonoscopies to clean the colon from low-risk and high-risk adenomas: results from the EPoS trials
 Gut, 72 (5), 951-957
 DOI 10.1136/gutjnl-2022-327696, PubMed 36307178
- 
 Artificial intelligence in gastroenterology: Where are we heading?
 Endosc Int Open, 10 (11), E1474-E1480
 DOI 10.1055/a-1907-6569, PubMed 36397868
- 
 Clinical trial designs for artificial intelligence in gastrointestinal endoscopy
 Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol, 7 (9), 785-786
 DOI 10.1016/S2468-1253(22)00232-1, PubMed 35932767
- 
 Artificial intelligence for disease diagnosis: the criterion standard challenge
 Gastrointest Endosc, 96 (2), 370-372
 DOI 10.1016/j.gie.2022.04.057, PubMed 35489396
- 
 Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Colonoscopy Surveillance After Polyp Removal: A Pooled Analysis of Randomized Trials
 Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol, 21 (4), 949-959.e2
 DOI 10.1016/j.cgh.2022.08.022, PubMed 36038128
- 
 Complete polyp resection with cold snare versus hot snare polypectomy for polyps of 4-9 mm: a randomized controlled trial
 Endoscopy, 54 (10), 961-969
 DOI 10.1055/a-1734-7952, PubMed 35008112
- 
 Reducing the environmental footprint of gastrointestinal endoscopy: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) and European Society of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Nurses and Associates (ESGENA) Position Statement
 Endoscopy, 54 (8), 797-826
 DOI 10.1055/a-1859-3726, PubMed 35803275
- 
 Risk of hepato-pancreato-biliary cancer is increased by primary sclerosing cholangitis in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: A population-based cohort study
 United European Gastroenterol J, 10 (2), 212-224
 DOI 10.1002/ueg2.12204, PubMed 35107865
- 
 Inflammatory bowel disease and risk of adenocarcinoma and neuroendocrine tumors in the small bowel
 Ann Oncol, 33 (6), 649-656
 DOI 10.1016/j.annonc.2022.02.226, PubMed 35276334
Publications 2021
- 
 Evidence and Precaution for Legal Health Interventions: Learning From the COVID-19 Pandemic
 Ann Intern Med, 174 (10), 1456-1457
 DOI 10.7326/M21-2839, PubMed 34370512
- 
 Deep learning and cancer biomarkers: recognising lead-time bias
 Lancet, 397 (10270), 194
 DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32402-8, PubMed 33453776
- 
 Colorectal Cancer Screening: Randomized Trials Are Essential to Support Recommendations
 Ann Intern Med, 175 (1), 129-130
 DOI 10.7326/M21-3770, PubMed 34748373
- 
 ESGE and ESGENA Position Statement on gastrointestinal endoscopy and COVID-19: Updated guidance for the era of vaccines and viral variants
 Endoscopy, 54 (2), 211-216
 DOI 10.1055/a-1700-4897, PubMed 34933373
- 
 Covid-19 transmission in fitness centers in Norway - a randomized trial
 BMC Public Health, 21 (1), 2103
 DOI 10.1186/s12889-021-12073-0, PubMed 34789188
- 
 Long-term colorectal cancer incidence and mortality after adenoma removal in women and men
 Aliment Pharmacol Ther, 55 (4), 412-421
 DOI 10.1111/apt.16686, PubMed 34716941
- 
 Mortality in Norway and Sweden during the COVID-19 pandemic
 Scand J Public Health, 50 (1), 38-45
 DOI 10.1177/14034948211047137, PubMed 34609261
- 
 Addressing false-positive findings with artificial intelligence for polyp detection
 Endoscopy, 53 (9), 941-942
 DOI 10.1055/a-1381-7849, PubMed 34438457
- 
 Hopes and Hypes for Artificial Intelligence in Colorectal Cancer Screening
 Gastroenterology, 161 (3), 774-777
 DOI 10.1053/j.gastro.2021.04.078, PubMed 33989659
- 
 Artificial intelligence in colonoscopy - Now on the market. What's next?
 J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 36 (1), 7-11
 DOI 10.1111/jgh.15339, PubMed 33179322
- 
 Women require routine opioids to prevent painful colonoscopies: a randomised controlled trial
 Scand J Gastroenterol, 56 (12), 1480-1489
 DOI 10.1080/00365521.2021.1969683, PubMed 34534048
- 
 A novel intragastric balloon for treatment of obesity and type 2 diabetes. A two-center pilot trial
 Scand J Gastroenterol, 57 (2), 232-238
 DOI 10.1080/00365521.2021.1994641, PubMed 34714203
- 
 The impact of information about different absolute benefits and harms on intention to participate in colorectal cancer screening: A think-aloud study and online randomised experiment
 PLoS One, 16 (2), e0246991
 DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0246991, PubMed 33592037
- 
 Association of Adenoma Detection Rate and Adenoma Characteristics With Colorectal Cancer Mortality After Screening Colonoscopy
 Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol, 19 (9), 1890-1898
 DOI 10.1016/j.cgh.2021.04.023, PubMed 33878471
- 
 Estimation of overdiagnosis in colorectal cancer screening with sigmoidoscopy and faecal occult blood testing: comparison of simulation models
 BMJ Open, 11 (4), e042158
 DOI 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042158, PubMed 33853794
Publications 2020
- 
 Assessment of cancer screening effectiveness in the era of screening programs
 Eur J Epidemiol, 35 (10), 891-897
 DOI 10.1007/s10654-020-00684-7, PubMed 32929645
- 
 National Screening Program for Bowel Cancer
 Tidsskr. Nor. Laegeforen., 140 (3), 222
- 
 [National screening programme for colorectal cancer]
 Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen, 140 (3)
 DOI 10.4045/tidsskr.19.0658, PubMed 32105033
- 
 Colorectal polyp characterization with endocytoscopy: Ready for widespread implementation with artificial intelligence?
 Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol, 52-53, 101721
 DOI 10.1016/j.bpg.2020.101721, PubMed 34172248
- 
 Artificial intelligence for polyp detection during colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
 Endoscopy, 53 (3), 277-284
 DOI 10.1055/a-1201-7165, PubMed 32557490
- 
 The future of colorectal cancer screening: Parentalism or shared decision-making?
 CMAJ, 192 (18), E484
 DOI 10.1503/cmaj.74839, PubMed 32366471
- 
 Disparities in Preventive Health Services: Targeting Minorities and Majorities
 Ann Intern Med, 172 (4), 287-288
 DOI 10.7326/M19-3899, PubMed 31931529
- 
 Colorectal Cancer Screening in Young Adults: About Carcinoid Tumors and Cancer
 Ann Intern Med, 174 (2), 263-264
 DOI 10.7326/M20-7244, PubMed 33315472
- 
 Post-polypectomy colonoscopy surveillance: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline - Update 2020
 Endoscopy, 52 (8), 687-700
 DOI 10.1055/a-1185-3109, PubMed 32572858
- 
 The COVID-19 pandemic in Norway and Sweden - threats, trust, and impact on daily life: a comparative survey
 BMC Public Health, 20 (1), 1597
 DOI 10.1186/s12889-020-09615-3, PubMed 33097011
- 
 Establishing thresholds for important benefits considering the harms of screening interventions
 BMJ Open, 10 (12), e037854
 DOI 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037854, PubMed 33268400
- 
 Ongoing Trials Will Not Determine the Comparative Effectiveness of Colorectal Cancer Screening Tests
 Gastroenterology, 164 (6), 856-860
 DOI 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.02.071, PubMed 32585308
- 
 Improving cancer screening programs
 Science, 367 (6474), 143-144
 DOI 10.1126/science.aay3156, PubMed 31919207
- 
 Presentation of numbers: do let that fool you
 Tidsskr. Nor. Laegeforen., 140 (8), 738
- 
 [Presentation of figures: don’t be fooled]
 Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen, 140 (8)
 DOI 10.4045/tidsskr.20.0378, PubMed 32463198
- 
 Cost savings in colonoscopy with artificial intelligence-aided polyp diagnosis: an add-on analysis of a clinical trial (with video)
 Gastrointest Endosc, 92 (4), 905-911.e1
 DOI 10.1016/j.gie.2020.03.3759, PubMed 32240683
- 
 Incomplete endoscopic resection of colorectal polyps: a prospective quality assurance study
 Endoscopy, 53 (4), 383-391
 DOI 10.1055/a-1243-0379, PubMed 32961579
- 
 Colorectal Cancer Screening With Repeated Fecal Immunochemical Test Versus Sigmoidoscopy: Baseline Results From a Randomized Trial
 Gastroenterology, 160 (4), 1085-1096.e5
 DOI 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.11.037, PubMed 33227280
- 
 Principles for Evaluation of Surveillance After Removal of Colorectal Polyps: Recommendations From the World Endoscopy Organization
 Gastroenterology, 158 (6), 1529-1533.e4
 DOI 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.12.052, PubMed 32240700
- 
 Laparoscopy-assisted versus balloon enteroscopy-assisted ERCP after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass
 Endoscopy, 52 (8), 654-661
 DOI 10.1055/a-1139-9313, PubMed 32316042
- 
 Colonoscopist Performance and Colorectal Cancer Risk After Adenoma Removal to Stratify Surveillance: Two Nationwide Observational Studies
 Gastroenterology, 160 (4), 1067-1074.e6
 DOI 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.10.009, PubMed 33065063
- 
 How do cancer screening guidelines trade off benefits versus harms and burdens of screening? A systematic survey
 BMJ Open, 10 (12), e038322
 DOI 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038322, PubMed 33268404
- 
 Designs of colonoscopic adenoma detection trials: more positive results with tandem than with parallel studies - an analysis of studies on imaging techniques and mechanical devices
 Gut, 70 (2), 268-275
 DOI 10.1136/gutjnl-2020-320984, PubMed 32409588
Publications 2019
- 
 Time to abandon early detection cancer screening
 Eur J Clin Invest, 49 (3), e13062
 DOI 10.1111/eci.13062, PubMed 30565674
- 
 Author Reply to: The name of the game: Is preventive screening "cancer screening?"
 Eur J Clin Invest, 49 (6), e13097
 DOI 10.1111/eci.13097, PubMed 30829396
- 
 Implications of different guidelines for surveillance after serrated polyp resection in United States of America and Europe
 Endoscopy, 51 (8), 750-758
 DOI 10.1055/a-0916-8598, PubMed 31195423
- 
 Detection rates during colonoscopy: What matters most?
 Endoscopy, 52 (1), 15-16
 DOI 10.1055/a-1058-8854, PubMed 31853929
- 
 From Colorectal Cancer Screening Guidelines to Headlines: Beware!
 Ann Intern Med, 170 (10), 734
 DOI 10.7326/L19-0086, PubMed 31108525
- 
 Effectiveness of digital feedback on patient experience and 30-day complications after screening colonoscopy: a randomized health services study
 Endosc Int Open, 7 (4), E537-E544
 DOI 10.1055/a-0830-4648, PubMed 31041371
- 
 Colorectal cancer screening with faecal immunochemical testing, sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy: a microsimulation modelling study
 BMJ, 367, l5383
 DOI 10.1136/bmj.l5383, PubMed 31578177
- 
 Estimating the Effect of Preventive Services With Databases of Administrative Claims: Reasons to Be Concerned
 Am J Epidemiol, 188 (10), 1764-1767
 DOI 10.1093/aje/kwz049, PubMed 30869122
- 
 Bowel preparation for colonoscopy: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline - Update 2019
 Endoscopy, 51 (8), 775-794
 DOI 10.1055/a-0959-0505, PubMed 31295746
- 
 Colorectal cancer screening with faecal immunochemical testing, sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy: a clinical practice guideline
 BMJ, 367, l5515
 DOI 10.1136/bmj.l5515, PubMed 31578196
- 
 [Colorectal cancer screening, yes or no?]
 Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen, 139 (15)
 DOI 10.4045/tidsskr.19.0323, PubMed 31642636
- 
 Colorectal cancer screening, right?
 Tidsskr. Nor. Laegeforen., 139 (15), 1450-1451
- 
 Polyp detection rates as quality indicator in clinical versus screening colonoscopy
 Endosc Int Open, 7 (2), E195-E202
 DOI 10.1055/a-0796-6477, PubMed 30705953
- 
 Registration bias in a clinical quality register
 Endosc Int Open, 7 (1), E90-E98
 DOI 10.1055/a-0806-7006, PubMed 30652120
- 
 Revisiting surveillance schemes for cancer survivors
 Ann Oncol, 30 (6), 881-883
 DOI 10.1093/annonc/mdz107, PubMed 30895293
- 
 Reply to the letter to the editor 'Cancer survivors: surveillance or not surveillance?' by Santeufemia and Miolo
 Ann Oncol, 30 (9), 1531-1532
 DOI 10.1093/annonc/mdz190, PubMed 31198953
- 
 Effects of Oral Anticoagulants and Aspirin on Performance of Fecal Immunochemical Tests in Colorectal Cancer Screening
 Gastroenterology, 156 (6), 1642-1649.e1
 DOI 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.01.040, PubMed 30689972
- 
 Performance measures for small-bowel endoscopy: a European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Quality Improvement Initiative
 Endoscopy, 51 (6), 574-598
 DOI 10.1055/a-0889-9586, PubMed 31075800
- 
 Performance measures for small-bowel endoscopy: A European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Quality Improvement Initiative
 United European Gastroenterol J, 7 (5), 614-641
 DOI 10.1177/2050640619850365, PubMed 31210941
- 
 Efficacy and Tolerability of High- vs Low-Volume Split-Dose Bowel Cleansing Regimens for Colonoscopy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
 Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol, 18 (7), 1454-1465.e14
 DOI 10.1016/j.cgh.2019.10.044, PubMed 31683057
- 
 Colorectal Cancer Incidence and Mortality After Removal of Adenomas During Screening Colonoscopies
 Gastroenterology, 158 (4), 875-883.e5
 DOI 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.09.011, PubMed 31563625
Publications 2018
- 
 [Screening for melanoma is a poor idea]
 Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen, 138 (17)
 DOI 10.4045/tidsskr.18.0600, PubMed 30378406
- 
 Screening for melanoma is a bad idea
 Tidsskr. Nor. Laegeforen., 138 (17), 1589
- 
 Uterine morcellation and survival in uterine sarcomas
 Eur J Cancer, 101, 62-68
 DOI 10.1016/j.ejca.2018.06.007, PubMed 30025231
- 
 When no guideline recommendation is the best recommendation
 Lancet, 392 (10151), 898-899
 DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31671-4, PubMed 30238877
- 
 From Colorectal Cancer Screening Guidelines to Headlines: Beware!
 Ann Intern Med, 169 (6), 405-406
 DOI 10.7326/M18-1720, PubMed 29987330
- 
 Performance measures for ERCP and endoscopic ultrasound: a European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Quality Improvement Initiative
 Endoscopy, 50 (11), 1116-1127
 DOI 10.1055/a-0749-8767, PubMed 30340220
- 
 Performance measures for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and endoscopic ultrasound: A European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Quality Improvement Initiative
 United European Gastroenterol J, 6 (10), 1448-1460
 DOI 10.1177/2050640618808157, PubMed 30574315
- 
 Why a randomized melanoma screening trial is not a good idea
 Br J Dermatol, 179 (2), 532-533
 DOI 10.1111/bjd.16784, PubMed 29893490
- 
 Long-Term Effectiveness of Sigmoidoscopy Screening on Colorectal Cancer Incidence and Mortality in Women and Men: A Randomized Trial
 Ann Intern Med, 168 (11), 775-782
 DOI 10.7326/M17-1441, PubMed 29710125
- 
 Long-Term Effectiveness of Sigmoidoscopy Screening in Women and Men
 Ann Intern Med, 169 (9), 663-664
 DOI 10.7326/L18-0512, PubMed 30398636
- 
 Endoscopy assistants influence the quality of colonoscopy
 Endoscopy, 50 (9), 871-877
 DOI 10.1055/s-0044-101706, PubMed 29444529
- 
 Mortality From Postscreening (Interval) Colorectal Cancers Is Comparable to That From Cancer in Unscreened Patients-A Randomized Sigmoidoscopy Trial
 Gastroenterology, 155 (6), 1787-1794.e3
 DOI 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.08.035, PubMed 30165051
- 
 Fecal Microbiota Transplantation for Primary Clostridium difficile Infection
 N Engl J Med, 378 (26), 2535-2536
 DOI 10.1056/NEJMc1803103, PubMed 29860912
- 
 Overdiagnosis in Colorectal Cancer Screening: Time to Acknowledge a Blind Spot
 Gastroenterology, 155 (3), 592-595
 DOI 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.07.037, PubMed 30076834
- 
 Polypectomy techniques among gastroenterologists in Norway - a nationwide survey
 Endosc Int Open, 6 (7), E812-E820
 DOI 10.1055/a-0607-0727, PubMed 29977999
- 
 Number of Adenomas Removed and Colorectal Cancers Prevented in Randomized Trials of Flexible Sigmoidoscopy Screening
 Gastroenterology, 155 (4), 1059-1068.e2
 DOI 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.06.040, PubMed 29935150
- 
 Performance measures for endoscopy services: a European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Quality Improvement Initiative
 Endoscopy, 50 (12), 1186-1204
 DOI 10.1055/a-0755-7515, PubMed 30423593
- 
 Performance measures for endoscopy services: A European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) quality improvement initiative
 United European Gastroenterol J, 7 (1), 21-44
 DOI 10.1177/2050640618810242, PubMed 30788114
Publications 2017
- 
 Local emergency medical response after a terrorist attack in Norway: a qualitative study
 BMJ Qual Saf, 26 (10), 806-816
 DOI 10.1136/bmjqs-2017-006517, PubMed 28676492
- 
 Domains associated with successful quality improvement in healthcare - a nationwide case study
 BMC Health Serv Res, 17 (1), 648
 DOI 10.1186/s12913-017-2454-2, PubMed 28903723
- 
 [Data sharing]
 Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen, 137 (10), 738
 DOI 10.4045/tidsskr.17.0366, PubMed 28551975
- 
 [Correct and proper critical pathway]
 Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen, 137 (17)
 DOI 10.4045/tidsskr.17.0510, PubMed 28925233
- 
 Right and correct package
 Tidsskr. Nor. Laegeforen., 137 (17), 1264
- 
 Zweifel
 Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen, 137 (20)
 DOI 10.4045/tidsskr.17.0875, PubMed 29094556
- 
 Doubt
 Tidsskr. Nor. Laegeforen., 137 (20), 1577-1578
- 
 Foreword
 Endoscopy, 49 (3), 213
 DOI 10.1055/s-0043-102442, PubMed 28249316
- 
 Uppföljning efter polypektomi: riktlinjer, tro och evidens
 Lakartidningen, 114
 PubMed 28696487
- 
 New specialist education for doctors- from Swiss cheese to Kraftkar?
 Tidsskr. Nor. Laegeforen., 137 (17), 1270-1271
- 
 [New specialist training for physicians - from Swiss cheese to strongman?]
 Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen, 137 (17)
 DOI 10.4045/tidsskr.17.0637, PubMed 28925200
- 
 Colorectal cancer death after adenoma removal in Scandinavia
 Scand J Gastroenterol, 52 (12), 1377-1384
 DOI 10.1080/00365521.2017.1377763, PubMed 28906163
- 
 Quality Indicators in Colonoscopy
 Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol, 15 (3), 416-428
 DOI 10.1007/s11938-017-0140-4, PubMed 28702775
- 
 Screening Colonoscopy to Prevent Colorectal Cancer Among Medicare Beneficiaries Aged 70 to 79 Years
 Ann Intern Med, 166 (10), 758-759
 DOI 10.7326/L17-0138, PubMed 28505646
- 
 Patient-reported adverse events after colonoscopy in Norway
 Endoscopy, 49 (8), 745-753
 DOI 10.1055/s-0043-105265, PubMed 28445903
- 
 Cecum intubation rate as quality indicator in clinical versus screening colonoscopy
 Endosc Int Open, 5 (6), E489-E495
 DOI 10.1055/s-0043-106180, PubMed 28573182
- 
 Authors' reply to Doherty and Hawkins
 BMJ, 356, j1267
 DOI 10.1136/bmj.j1267, PubMed 28283482
- 
 Effectiveness of flexible sigmoidoscopy screening in men and women and different age groups: pooled analysis of randomised trials
 BMJ, 356, i6673
 DOI 10.1136/bmj.i6673, PubMed 28087510
- 
 Performance measures for lower gastrointestinal endoscopy: a European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Quality Improvement Initiative
 Endoscopy, 49 (4), 378-397
 DOI 10.1055/s-0043-103411, PubMed 28268235
- 
 Performance measures for lower gastrointestinal endoscopy: a European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) quality improvement initiative
 United European Gastroenterol J, 5 (3), 309-334
 DOI 10.1177/2050640617700014, PubMed 28507745
- 
 Sigmoidoscopy and faecal occult blood test - a comparative screening trial
 Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen, 137 (10), 727-730
 DOI 10.4045/tidsskr.16.1031, PubMed 28551972
- 
 Colorectal adenomas, surveillance, and cancer
 Lancet Oncol, 18 (8), e427
 DOI 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30473-4, PubMed 28759374
- 
 [More harm than benefit - how much should the patients know?]
 Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen, 137 (3), 175-176
 DOI 10.4045/tidsskr.16.0954, PubMed 28181749
- 
 S.E. Olsen og medarbeidere svarer
 Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen, 137 (9), 599
 DOI 10.4045/tidsskr.17.0296, PubMed 28468459
- 
 More harm than benefit - how much should the patients know? Reply
 Tidsskr. Nor. Laegeforen., 137 (9), 599
- 
 Epidemiology and risk factors of colorectal polyps
 Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol, 31 (4), 419-424
 DOI 10.1016/j.bpg.2017.06.004, PubMed 28842051
Publications 2016
- 
 The continuing uncertainty about cancer risk in inflammatory bowel disease
 Gut, 65 (6), 889-93
 DOI 10.1136/gutjnl-2015-311003, PubMed 27008845
- 
 Are rapidly growing cancers more lethal?
 Eur J Cancer, 72, 210-214
 DOI 10.1016/j.ejca.2016.11.011, PubMed 28042992
- 
 Lifestyle changes at middle age and mortality: a population-based prospective cohort study
 J Epidemiol Community Health, 71 (1), 59-66
 DOI 10.1136/jech-2015-206760, PubMed 27312250
- 
 Performance measures for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Quality Improvement Initiative
 Endoscopy, 48 (9), 843-64
 DOI 10.1055/s-0042-113128, PubMed 27548885
- 
 Performance measures for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: A European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy quality improvement initiative
 United European Gastroenterol J, 4 (5), 629-656
 DOI 10.1177/2050640616664843, PubMed 27733906
- 
 [M. Bretthauer & E. Hem reply]
 Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen, 136 (1), 10
 DOI 10.4045/tidsskr.15.1307, PubMed 26757645
- 
 Circumcision of boys Reply
 Tidsskr. Nor. Laegeforen., 136 (1), 10
- 
 Who Is for CO2? Slow Adoption of Carbon Dioxide Insufflation in Colonoscopy
 Ann Intern Med, 165 (2), 145-6
 DOI 10.7326/M16-0209, PubMed 27159139
- 
 America, We Are Confused: The Updated U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation on Colorectal Cancer Screening
 Ann Intern Med, 166 (2), 139-140
 DOI 10.7326/M16-1805, PubMed 27820949
- 
 Population-Based Colonoscopy Screening for Colorectal Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial
 JAMA Intern Med, 176 (7), 894-902
 DOI 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.0960, PubMed 27214731
- 
 Snill Perfeksjonistisk Refser
 Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen, 136 (1), 24-6
 DOI 10.4045/tidsskr.15.1257, PubMed 26757655
- 
 Requirements and standards facilitating quality improvement for reporting systems in gastrointestinal endoscopy: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Position Statement
 Endoscopy, 48 (3), 291-4
 DOI 10.1055/s-0042-100186, PubMed 26841269
- 
 Reporting systems in gastrointestinal endoscopy: Requirements and standards facilitating quality improvement: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy position statement
 United European Gastroenterol J, 4 (2), 172-6
 DOI 10.1177/2050640616629079, PubMed 27087943
- 
 Endoscopy again supports Colorectal Cancer Awareness Month
 Endoscopy, 48 (3), 209
 DOI 10.1055/s-0042-102468, PubMed 26906311
- 
 Systematic review with meta-analysis: the comparative effectiveness of aspirin vs. screening for colorectal cancer prevention
 Aliment Pharmacol Ther, 45 (2), 193-204
 DOI 10.1111/apt.13857, PubMed 27859394
- 
 Cecal intubation failure: Refer or change technique?
 Gastrointest Endosc, 83 (6), 1245-7
 DOI 10.1016/j.gie.2015.12.014, PubMed 27206588
- 
 Gradual stiffness versus magnetic imaging-guided variable stiffness colonoscopes: A randomized noninferiority trial
 United European Gastroenterol J, 5 (1), 128-133
 DOI 10.1177/2050640616639162, PubMed 28405331
- 
 Effectiveness of Screening Colonoscopy to Prevent Colorectal Cancer Among Medicare Beneficiaries Aged 70 to 79 Years: A Prospective Observational Study
 Ann Intern Med, 166 (1), 18-26
 DOI 10.7326/M16-0758, PubMed 27669524
- 
 Colonoscopy and Risk of Infective Endocarditis in the Elderly
 J Am Coll Cardiol, 68 (5), 570-571
 DOI 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.05.041, PubMed 27470461
- 
 D.K. Gjøstein og medarbeidere svarer
 Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen, 136 (16), 1326-7
 DOI 10.4045/tidsskr.16.0690, PubMed 27637038
- 
 Incentives and participation in a medical survey
 Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen, 136 (12-13), 1082-7
 DOI 10.4045/tidsskr.15.1096, PubMed 27381786
- 
 Pain and sedation during colonoscopy - a never ending story
 Endosc Int Open, 4 (5), E538-9
 DOI 10.1055/s-0042-106085, PubMed 27227111
- 
 Routine vs. on-demand analgesia in colonoscopy: a randomized clinical trial
 Endoscopy, 48 (9), 823-8
 DOI 10.1055/s-0042-108433, PubMed 27305424
- 
 Rationale and design of the European Polyp Surveillance (EPoS) trials
 Endoscopy, 48 (6), 571-8
 DOI 10.1055/s-0042-104116, PubMed 27042931
- 
 Recognizing Data Generation
 N Engl J Med, 374 (19), 1898
 DOI 10.1056/NEJMc1603789, PubMed 27096437
- 
 Cancer surveillance in gastroenterology practice
 Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol, 30 (6), 853-854
 DOI 10.1016/j.bpg.2016.10.016, PubMed 27938780
- 
 Commentary: "Randomize, Then Consent" or "Consent, Then Randomize"?: Revitalizing the Issue of Preconsent Randomization
 Epidemiology, 27 (3), 393-4
 DOI 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000469, PubMed 26849639
- 
 Expert opinions and scientific evidence for colonoscopy key performance indicators
 Gut, 65 (12), 2045-2060
 DOI 10.1136/gutjnl-2016-312043, PubMed 27802153
- 
 European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy - Establishing the key unanswered research questions within gastrointestinal endoscopy
 Endoscopy, 48 (10), 884-891
 DOI 10.1055/s-0042-110398, PubMed 27485483
Publications 2015
- 
 [Circumcision of boys]
 Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen, 135 (21), 1926-7
 DOI 10.4045/tidsskr.15.0756, PubMed 26577316
- 
 [M. Bretthauer & E. Hem reply]
 Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen, 135 (23-24), 2130
 DOI 10.4045/tidsskr.15.1254, PubMed 26674025
- 
 Circumcision of boys Reply
 Tidsskr. Nor. Laegeforen., 135 (23-24), 2130
- 
 Do's and don'ts in evaluation of endoscopic screening for gastrointestinal cancers
 Endoscopy, 48 (1), 75-80
 DOI 10.1055/s-0034-1393094, PubMed 26382306
- 
 More adenomas - less cancer? Advanced imaging in colonoscopy
 Endoscopy, 47 (5), 396-7
 DOI 10.1055/s-0034-1391864, PubMed 25910007
- 
 Reply to Ishaq et al
 Endoscopy, 47 (10), 959
 DOI 10.1055/s-0034-1392409, PubMed 26417975
- 
 Water exchange versus carbon dioxide insufflation in unsedated colonoscopy: less is more Reply
 Endoscopy, 47 (10), 959
- 
 Efficacy and safety of endoscopic resection of large colorectal polyps: a systematic review and meta-analysis
 Gut, 65 (5), 806-20
 DOI 10.1136/gutjnl-2014-308481, PubMed 25681402
- 
 Leadership training to improve adenoma detection rate in screening colonoscopy: a randomised trial
 Gut, 65 (4), 616-24
 DOI 10.1136/gutjnl-2014-307503, PubMed 25670810
- 
 Benefits and harms of mammography screening
 Breast Cancer Res, 17 (1), 63
 DOI 10.1186/s13058-015-0525-z, PubMed 25928287
- 
 Time trends in quality indicators of colonoscopy
 United European Gastroenterol J, 4 (1), 110-20
 DOI 10.1177/2050640615570147, PubMed 26966531
- 
 Effectiveness, training and quality assurance of colonoscopy screening for colorectal cancer
 Gut, 64 (6), 982-90
 DOI 10.1136/gutjnl-2014-308076, PubMed 25804631
- 
 The European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Quality Improvement Initiative: developing performance measures
 Endoscopy, 48 (1), 81-9
 DOI 10.1055/s-0035-1569580, PubMed 26662057
- 
 The European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Quality Improvement Initiative: developing performance measures
 United European Gastroenterol J, 4 (1), 30-41
 DOI 10.1177/2050640615624631, PubMed 26966520
- 
 Clinical indications for computed tomographic colonography: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) and European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) Guideline
 Eur Radiol, 25 (2), 331-45
 DOI 10.1007/s00330-014-3435-z, PubMed 25278245
- 
 Bounding the per-protocol effect in randomized trials: an application to colorectal cancer screening
 Trials, 16, 541
 DOI 10.1186/s13063-015-1056-8, PubMed 26620120
Publications 2014
- 
 Long-term lifestyle changes after colorectal cancer screening: randomised controlled trial
 Gut, 64 (8), 1268-76
 DOI 10.1136/gutjnl-2014-307376, PubMed 25183203
- 
 Endoscopy training: time to stop counting procedures?
 Gut, 63 (11), 1686-7
 DOI 10.1136/gutjnl-2014-306765, PubMed 24604824
- 
 Long-Term Colorectal-Cancer Mortality after Adenoma Removal REPLY
 N. Engl. J. Med., 371 (21), 2035-2036
- 
 Long-term colorectal-cancer mortality after adenoma removal
 N Engl J Med, 371 (21), 2036-7
 DOI 10.1056/NEJMc1411954, PubMed 25409378
- 
 Water exchange versus carbon dioxide insufflation in unsedated colonoscopy: a multicenter randomized controlled trial
 Endoscopy, 47 (3), 192-9
 DOI 10.1055/s-0034-1390795, PubMed 25412093
- 
 [What should non-inferiority studies be called in Norwegian?]
 Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen, 134 (8), 852-3
 DOI 10.4045/tidsskr.14.0059, PubMed 24780988
- 
 [P. Gjersvik and colleagues reply]
 Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen, 134 (12-13), 1215
 DOI 10.4045/tidsskr.14.0744, PubMed 24989185
- 
 [Comparative effectiveness research]
 Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen, 134 (14), 1374
 DOI 10.4045/tidsskr.14.0485, PubMed 25096435
- 
 [Consensus-based guidelines may prevent necessary research]
 Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen, 134 (2), 148-9
 DOI 10.4045/tidsskr.13.1313, PubMed 24477144
- 
 Long-term risk of colorectal cancer in individuals with serrated polyps
 Gut, 64 (6), 929-36
 DOI 10.1136/gutjnl-2014-307793, PubMed 25399542
- 
 Effect of flexible sigmoidoscopy screening on colorectal cancer incidence and mortality: a randomized clinical trial
 JAMA, 312 (6), 606-15
 DOI 10.1001/jama.2014.8266, PubMed 25117129
- 
 [Implementation of guidelines for PSA testing in general practice]
 Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen, 134 (21), 2032-4
 DOI 10.4045/tidsskr.14.0982, PubMed 25387926
- 
 Too much mammography
 BMJ, 348, g1403
 DOI 10.1136/bmj.g1403, PubMed 24519765
- 
 Comparative analysis of breast cancer mortality following mammography screening in Denmark and Norway
 Ann Oncol, 25 (6), 1137-43
 DOI 10.1093/annonc/mdu122, PubMed 24669012
- 
 Polyethylene glycol vs sodium picosulfate/magnesium citrate for colonoscopy preparation
 Endosc Int Open, 2 (4), E230-4
 DOI 10.1055/s-0034-1377520, PubMed 26135098
- 
 Long-term colorectal-cancer mortality after adenoma removal
 N Engl J Med, 371 (9), 799-807
 DOI 10.1056/NEJMoa1315870, PubMed 25162886
- 
 Clinical indications for computed tomographic colonography: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) and European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) Guideline
 Endoscopy, 46 (10), 897-915
 DOI 10.1055/s-0034-1378092, PubMed 25268304
- 
 Ethical issues in colorectal cancer screening
 Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol, 28 (2), 315-26
 DOI 10.1016/j.bpg.2014.03.002, PubMed 24810192
Publications 2013
- 
 Computed tomography colonography vs. colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening: close call, but not closed case
 Endoscopy, 45 (3), 159-60
 DOI 10.1055/s-0032-1326208, PubMed 23446666
- 
 Principles, effectiveness and caveats in screening for cancer
 Br J Surg, 100 (1), 55-65
 DOI 10.1002/bjs.8995, PubMed 23212620
- 
 [Who should perform endoscopies?]
 Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen, 133 (11), 1171
 DOI 10.4045/tidsskr.13.0625, PubMed 23759774
- 
 Current status of screening for colorectal cancer
 Ann Oncol, 24 (8), 1963-72
 DOI 10.1093/annonc/mdt157, PubMed 23619033
- 
 Bowel preparation for colonoscopy: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) guideline
 Endoscopy, 45 (2), 142-50
 DOI 10.1055/s-0032-1326186, PubMed 23335011
- 
 New polyps, old tricks: controversy about removing benign bowel lesions
 BMJ, 347, f5843
 DOI 10.1136/bmj.f5843, PubMed 24103540
- 
 Risk stratification to predict pain during unsedated colonoscopy: results of a multicenter cohort study
 Endoscopy, 45 (9), 691-6
 DOI 10.1055/s-0033-1344239, PubMed 23884794
- 
 Flexible sigmoidoscopy versus faecal occult blood testing for colorectal cancer screening in asymptomatic individuals
 Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2013 (9), CD009259
 DOI 10.1002/14651858.CD009259.pub2, PubMed 24085634
- 
 [Pain in connection with colonoscopy in Norway]
 Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen, 133 (10), 1074-8
 DOI 10.4045/tidsskr.12.1467, PubMed 23712171
- 
 Failure to account for selection-bias
 Int J Cancer, 133 (11), 2751-3
 DOI 10.1002/ijc.28244, PubMed 23649899
- 
 Colorectal cancer screening--optimizing current strategies and new directions
 Nat Rev Clin Oncol, 10 (3), 130-42
 DOI 10.1038/nrclinonc.2013.12, PubMed 23381005
- 
 Long-term effectiveness of endoscopic screening on incidence and mortality of colorectal cancer: A randomized trial
 United European Gastroenterol J, 1 (3), 162-8
 DOI 10.1177/2050640613483290, PubMed 24917955
- 
 From clinical questions to trustworthy answers
 Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen, 133 (15), 1611-4
 DOI 10.4045/tidsskr.13.0650, PubMed 23970279
Publications 2012
- 
 A tissue-based comparative effectiveness analysis of biomarkers for early detection of colorectal tumors
 Clin Transl Gastroenterol, 3 (12), e27
 DOI 10.1038/ctg.2012.21, PubMed 23324654
- 
 Risk stratification for advanced colorectal neoplasia--letter
 Cancer Prev Res (Phila), 5 (12), 1405; author reply 1406
 DOI 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-12-0383, PubMed 23151804
- 
 Comparative effectiveness research in cancer screening programmes
 BMJ, 344, e2864
 DOI 10.1136/bmj.e2864, PubMed 22628002
- 
 Colonoscopy as a triage screening test
 N Engl J Med, 366 (8), 759-60
 DOI 10.1056/NEJMe1114639, PubMed 22356330
- 
 Colorectal-Cancer Screening Reply
 N. Engl. J. Med., 366 (22), 2131
- 
 European guidelines for quality assurance in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis: overview and introduction to the full supplement publication
 Endoscopy, 45 (1), 51-9
 DOI 10.1055/s-0032-1325997, PubMed 23212726
- 
 Can old dogs learn new tricks?
 J Interv Gastroenterol, 2 (3), 126-127
 DOI 10.4161/jig.23733, PubMed 23805392
- 
 Reduced pain during screening colonoscopy with an ultrathin colonoscope: a randomized controlled trial
 Endoscopy, 44 (8), 740-6
 DOI 10.1055/s-0032-1309755, PubMed 22622786
- 
 Incontinence after colonoscopy--an unrecognized and preventable problem. A cross-sectional study from the Gastronet quality assurance program
 Endoscopy, 44 (4), 349-53
 DOI 10.1055/s-0031-1291657, PubMed 22392101
- 
 Overdiagnosis of invasive breast cancer due to mammography screening: results from the Norwegian screening program
 Ann Intern Med, 156 (7), 491-9
 DOI 10.7326/0003-4819-156-7-201204030-00005, PubMed 22473436
- 
 Overdiagnosis of Invasive Breast Cancer due to Mammography Screening RESPONSE
 Ann. Intern. Med., 157 (3), 221-222
 DOI 10.7326/0003-4819-157-3-201208070-00025
- 
 Limited use of nonprogram screening in Norway
 Int J Cancer, 132 (7), 1723-4
 DOI 10.1002/ijc.27807, PubMed 22933134
- 
 Prognosis in women with interval breast cancer: population based observational cohort study
 BMJ, 345, e7536
 DOI 10.1136/bmj.e7536, PubMed 23160783
- 
 The NordICC Study: rationale and design of a randomized trial on colonoscopy screening for colorectal cancer
 Endoscopy, 44 (7), 695-702
 DOI 10.1055/s-0032-1306895, PubMed 22723185
- 
 Single- versus double-balloon enteroscopy: the evidence base: Comment on Endoscopy essentials, Small-bowel endoscopy
 Endoscopy, 44 (8), 799; author reply 800
 DOI 10.1055/s-0032-1310001, PubMed 22833025
- 
 Withdrawal time as a quality indicator for colonoscopy - a nationwide analysis
 Endoscopy, 44 (5), 476-81
 DOI 10.1055/s-0032-1306898, PubMed 22531983
- 
 European guidelines for quality assurance in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis. First Edition--Quality assurance in endoscopy in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis
 Endoscopy, 44 Suppl 3, SE88-105
 DOI 10.1055/s-0032-1309795, PubMed 23012124
Publications 2011
- 
 Colorectal cancer screening
 J Intern Med, 270 (2), 87-98
 DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2011.02399.x, PubMed 21575082
- 
 [What is established treatment?]
 Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen, 131 (13-14), 1275
 DOI 10.4045/tidsskr.11.13E1, PubMed 21725376
- 
 Quality assurance in gastroenterology
 Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol, 25 (3), 335-6
 DOI 10.1016/j.bpg.2011.05.008, PubMed 21764001
- 
 Biomarkers related to one-carbon metabolism as potential risk factors for distal colorectal adenomas
 Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev, 20 (8), 1726-35
 DOI 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-11-0359, PubMed 21693628
- 
 Single- vs. double-balloon enteroscopy in small-bowel diagnostics: a randomized multicenter trial
 Endoscopy, 43 (6), 472-6
 DOI 10.1055/s-0030-1256247, PubMed 21384320
- 
 Gastronet survey on the use of one- or two-person technique for colonoscopy insertion
 BMC Gastroenterol, 11, 73
 DOI 10.1186/1471-230X-11-73, PubMed 21672243
- 
 Magnetic endoscopic imaging versus standard colonoscopy in a routine colonoscopy setting: a randomized, controlled trial
 Gastrointest Endosc, 73 (6), 1215-22
 DOI 10.1016/j.gie.2011.01.054, PubMed 21481862
- 
 Identification of an epigenetic biomarker panel with high sensitivity and specificity for colorectal cancer and adenomas
 Mol Cancer, 10, 85
 DOI 10.1186/1476-4598-10-85, PubMed 21777459
- 
 Nitrous oxide for analgesia in colonoscopy without sedation
 Gastrointest Endosc, 74 (6), 1347-53
 DOI 10.1016/j.gie.2011.07.071, PubMed 22136779
Publications 2010
- 
 Which tool is best for colorectal cancer screening?
 BMJ, 340, c2831
 DOI 10.1136/bmj.c2831, PubMed 20516015
- 
 ["Shall I not be randomized?"]
 Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen, 130 (11), 1119
 DOI 10.4045/tidsskr.10.0590, PubMed 20531489
- 
 Evidence for colorectal cancer screening
 Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol, 24 (4), 417-25
 DOI 10.1016/j.bpg.2010.06.005, PubMed 20833346
- 
 Turning science into clinical practice - the case of carbon dioxide insufflation
 Endoscopy, 42 (12), 1104-5
 DOI 10.1055/s-0030-1255973, PubMed 21120777
- 
 Colorectal cancer screening Author's reply
 Br. Med. J., 341, c4620
 DOI 10.1136/bmj.c4620
- 
 [Colorectal cancer screening--at last discussed!]
 Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen, 130 (20), 2012
 DOI 10.4045/tidsskr.10.0932, PubMed 20967034
- 
 Colonoscope with a sub-distal hyper-flaccid segment for improved insertion at colonoscopy: a randomized study
 Scand J Gastroenterol, 46 (1), 104-8
 DOI 10.3109/00365521.2010.521891, PubMed 20923378
- 
 Sustaining the vitality of colonoscopy quality improvement programmes over time. Experience from the Norwegian Gastronet programme
 Scand J Gastroenterol, 45 (3), 362-9
 DOI 10.3109/00365520903497106, PubMed 20095874
- 
 Patient satisfaction with on-demand sedation for outpatient colonoscopy
 Endoscopy, 42 (8), 639-46
 DOI 10.1055/s-0030-1255612, PubMed 20669075
Publications 2009
- 
 The capsule and colorectal-cancer screening--the crux of the matter
 N Engl J Med, 361 (3), 300-1
 DOI 10.1056/NEJMe0903924, PubMed 19605836
- 
 The First Transatlantic Symposium on Colorectal Cancer Screening
 Endoscopy, 41 (9), 816-7
 DOI 10.1055/s-0029-1215049, PubMed 19685421
- 
 [A year with New England Journal of Medicine]
 Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen, 129 (19), 1971
 DOI 10.4045/tidsskr.09.1022, PubMed 19823197
- 
 [Do you understand me?]
 Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen, 129 (21), 2211
 DOI 10.4045/tidsskr.09.1081, PubMed 19898565
- 
 Capsule Endoscopy versus Colonoscopy REPLY
 N. Engl. J. Med., 361 (16), 1609-1610
- 
 [Without registration, no publishing!]
 Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen, 129 (8), 733
 DOI 10.4045/tidsskr.09.08E1, PubMed 19373295
- 
 Risk of colorectal cancer seven years after flexible sigmoidoscopy screening: randomised controlled trial
 BMJ, 338, b1846
 DOI 10.1136/bmj.b1846, PubMed 19483252
- 
 Quality assurance as an integrated part of the electronic medical record - a prototype applied for colonoscopy
 Scand J Gastroenterol, 44 (10), 1259-65
 DOI 10.1080/00365520903132021, PubMed 19658021
- 
 Spontaneous regression of invasive breast cancer: does this study answer the question?
 Arch Intern Med, 169 (10), 997
 DOI 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.91, PubMed 19468097
- 
 Improved breast cancer survival following introduction of an organized mammography screening program among both screened and unscreened women: a population-based cohort study
 Breast Cancer Res, 11 (4), R44
 DOI 10.1186/bcr2331, PubMed 19575807
Publications 2008
- 
 [Statistical significance and clinical relevance]
 Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen, 128 (3), 279
 PubMed 18264146
- 
 Are sodium phosphate tablets better than polyethylene glycol solution plus bisacodyl tablets for bowel preparation?
 Nat Clin Pract Gastroenterol Hepatol, 5 (6), 296-7
 DOI 10.1038/ncpgasthep1142, PubMed 18461058
- 
 Erroneous on screening colonoscopy
 Z. Gastroent., 46 (6), 633
- 
 Appointments timed in proximity to annual milestones and compliance with screening: randomised controlled trial
 BMJ, 337, a2794
 DOI 10.1136/bmj.a2794, PubMed 19091759
- 
 Patients' satisfaction: an important factor in quality control of gastroscopies
 Scand J Gastroenterol, 43 (8), 1004-11
 DOI 10.1080/00365520801958592, PubMed 19086282
Publications 2007
- 
 [Prevention and early diagnosis of colorectal cancer]
 Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen, 127 (20), 2688-91
 PubMed 17952153
- 
 Carbon dioxide insufflation for more comfortable endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a randomized, controlled, double-blind trial
 Endoscopy, 39 (1), 58-64
 DOI 10.1055/s-2006-945036, PubMed 17252462
- 
 Carbon dioxide insufflation improves intubation depth in double-balloon enteroscopy: a randomized, controlled, double-blind trial
 Endoscopy, 39 (12), 1064-7
 DOI 10.1055/s-2007-966990, PubMed 18072057
- 
 Colonic explosion: an unavoidable complication?
 Endoscopy, 39 (3), 258
 DOI 10.1055/s-2007-966200, PubMed 17385113
- 
 Improvement in caecal intubation rate and pain reduction by using 3-dimensional magnetic imaging for unsedated colonoscopy: a randomized trial of patients referred for colonoscopy
 Scand J Gastroenterol, 42 (7), 885-9
 DOI 10.1080/00365520601127125, PubMed 17558914
- 
 [Colorectal cancer--a disease one doesn't talk about]
 Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen, 127 (20), 2651
 PubMed 17952144
- 
 Double-balloon enteroscopy for endoscopic retrograde cholangiography in patients with a Roux-en-Y anastomosis
 Endoscopy, 39 (12), 1068-71
 DOI 10.1055/s-2007-966841, PubMed 18072058
Publications 2006
- 
 [Can CT colonography replace coloscopy?]
 Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen, 126 (11), 1464
 PubMed 16732337
- 
 [Screening for colorectal cancer. Collaboration among politicians and scientists is necessary]
 Laeknabladid, 92 (7-8), 521-4
 PubMed 16818999
- 
 [Politics and science in colorectal cancer screening]
 Ugeskr Laeger, 168 (26-32), 2563-5
 PubMed 16824412
- 
 [Politics and science in colorectal cancer screening]
 Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen, 126 (13), 1766-7
 PubMed 16794676
- 
 The science and politics of colorectal cancer screening
 PLoS Med, 3 (1), e36; quiz e104
 DOI 10.1371/journal.pmed.0030036, PubMed 16383349
- 
 The Norwegian Gastronet project: Continuous quality improvement of colonoscopy in 14 Norwegian centres
 Scand J Gastroenterol, 41 (4), 481-7
 DOI 10.1080/00365520500265208, PubMed 16635918
Publications 2005
- 
 [Quality improvement in Norwegian hospitals]
 Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen, 125 (9), 1150
 PubMed 15880147
- 
 Carbon dioxide insufflation in colonoscopy: safe and effective in sedated patients
 Endoscopy, 37 (8), 706-9
 DOI 10.1055/s-2005-870154, PubMed 16032487
- 
 Lifestyle-related risk factors and chemoprevention for colorectal neoplasia: experience from the large-scale NORCCAP screening trial
 Eur J Cancer Prev, 14 (4), 373-9
 DOI 10.1097/00008469-200508000-00010, PubMed 16030428
- 
 Biopsy of colorectal polyps is not adequate for grading of neoplasia
 Endoscopy, 37 (12), 1193-7
 DOI 10.1055/s-2005-921031, PubMed 16329016
- 
 Evaluation of a novel colonoscope designed for easier passage through flexures: a randomized study
 Endoscopy, 37 (11), 1123-6
 DOI 10.1055/s-2005-870444, PubMed 16281143
- 
 Polyethylene glycol versus sodium phosphate in bowel cleansing for colonoscopy: a randomized trial
 Endoscopy, 37 (6), 537-41
 DOI 10.1055/s-2005-861315, PubMed 15933926
- 
 Sensitivity of pain rating scales in an endoscopy trial
 Clin J Pain, 21 (4), 292-6
 DOI 10.1097/01.ajp.0000110636.14355.3e, PubMed 15951645
- 
 [Presentation of statistical analysis in the Journal of the Norwegian Medical Association]
 Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen, 125 (16), 2183-7
 PubMed 16138131
Publications 2004
- 
 [Information about mammography screening]
 Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen, 124 (17), 2227
 PubMed 15356683
- 
 [When can generic preparations be used?]
 Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen, 124 (20), 2598
 PubMed 15534628
- 
 [Systematic quality control programme for colonoscopy in an endoscopy centre in Norway]
 Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen, 124 (10), 1402-5
 PubMed 15195182
- 
 Testing for faecal calprotectin (PhiCal) in the Norwegian Colorectal Cancer Prevention trial on flexible sigmoidoscopy screening: comparison with an immunochemical test for occult blood (FlexSure OBT)
 Gut, 53 (9), 1329-33
 DOI 10.1136/gut.2004.039032, PubMed 15306594
Publications 2003
- 
 The use of CO2 in colonoscopy
 Gastrointest Endosc, 57 (3), 436-7; author reply 437-8
 DOI 10.1067/mge.2003.108, PubMed 12612542
- 
 Air and carbon dioxide volumes insufflated during colonoscopy
 Gastrointest Endosc, 58 (2), 203-6
 DOI 10.1067/mge.2003.340, PubMed 12872086
- 
 Quality control in colorectal cancer screening: systematic microbiological investigation of endoscopes used in the NORCCAP (Norwegian Colorectal Cancer Prevention) trial
 BMC Gastroenterol, 3, 15
 DOI 10.1186/1471-230X-3-15, PubMed 12803654
- 
 Inter-endoscopist variation in polyp and neoplasia pick-up rates in flexible sigmoidoscopy screening for colorectal cancer
 Scand J Gastroenterol, 38 (12), 1268-74
 DOI 10.1080/00365520310006513, PubMed 14750648
- 
 Grading of distal colorectal adenomas as predictors for proximal colonic neoplasia and choice of endoscope in population screening: experience from the Norwegian Colorectal Cancer Prevention study (NORCCAP)
 Gut, 52 (3), 398-403
 DOI 10.1136/gut.52.3.398, PubMed 12584223
- 
 The Norwegian Colorectal Cancer Prevention (NORCCAP) screening study: baseline findings and implementations for clinical work-up in age groups 50-64 years
 Scand J Gastroenterol, 38 (6), 635-42
 DOI 10.1080/00365520310003002, PubMed 12825872
- 
 Re: Baseline findings of the Italian multicenter randomized controlled trial of "once-only sigmoidoscopy"--SCORE
 J Natl Cancer Inst, 95 (14), 1089-90; author reply 1090
 DOI 10.1093/jnci/95.14.1089, PubMed 12865459
Publications 2002
- 
 Design, organization and management of a controlled population screening study for detection of colorectal neoplasia: attendance rates in the NORCCAP study (Norwegian Colorectal Cancer Prevention)
 Scand J Gastroenterol, 37 (5), 568-73
 DOI 10.1080/00365520252903125, PubMed 12059059
- 
 Carbon dioxide insufflation reduces discomfort due to flexible sigmoidoscopy in colorectal cancer screening
 Scand J Gastroenterol, 37 (9), 1103-7
 DOI 10.1080/003655202320378329, PubMed 12374237
- 
 Use of a disposable sheath system for flexible sigmoidoscopy in decentralized colorectal cancer screening
 Endoscopy, 34 (10), 814-8
 DOI 10.1055/s-2002-34273, PubMed 12244504
- 
 NORCCAP (Norwegian colorectal cancer prevention): a randomised trial to assess the safety and efficacy of carbon dioxide versus air insufflation in colonoscopy
 Gut, 50 (5), 604-7
 DOI 10.1136/gut.50.5.604, PubMed 11950803
- 
 Continuous evaluation of patient satisfaction in endoscopy centres
 Scand J Gastroenterol, 37 (7), 850-5
 DOI 10.1080/713786520, PubMed 12190102
Publications 2000
- 
 [Practice from Germany not sanctioned as specialist education in Norway]
 Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen, 120 (21), 2580-1
 PubMed 11071005
Publications 1996
- 
 ACD versus standard CPR in a prehospital setting
 Resuscitation, 33 (2), 117-24
 DOI 10.1016/s0300-9572(96)01021-0, PubMed 9025127
